Tang Lang Quan
Repositioning
Standards in
Traditional Praying Mantis
1.
Introduction
2. Concepts of Traditional
Mantis Training
2.1 Combat
2.2 Dedication
2.3 Comprehensive
2.4 Standards and Values
3. Belts, Certificates and
Ego’s
4. Online Kung Fu Junkies
and Arm Chair Masters
5. Training and Performance
Videos
6. Meaning of Meaningless
Forms
7. Concluding Remarks
1. Introduction
Having dedicated almost twenty
five years of my life to traditional
Seven Star Praying Mantis, I feel extremely privileged as it has become
an inseparable part of my life, providing me with many good friends,
many good experiences, and an education in the traditional combative
arts. On top of that it has given me many opportunities to visit and
research other quality traditional Mantis schools and systems, meet
world class Mantis masters and students, exchange and participate with
the global Mantis community, and learn what true 'traditional praying
mantis' is. Over the years however I have also witnessed a gradual
de-evolution from predominately traditional Mantis to ‘watered down’
versions commonly seen today. It is in this regard that I have reached
the stark conclusion that the standards set by the old masters have
deteriorated to unacceptable levels.
The culprit lies in a flagging
commitment to maintaining the highest
levels of applied excellence and quality. In the real world (including
traditional Mantis), applied performance is the only true measure of
success. If individuals simply go through the motions and put in a half
assed effort, they will get half assed results in return - garbage in
garbage out as the maxim goes. More often than not people become
complacent in their training and loose perspective, eventually leading
to mediocrity and an overall “watering down affect” upon the integrity
of traditional kung fu systems, as well as the higher standards
excellence the past masters established before us.
In this piece entitled, a
Repositioning of Standards in Traditional
Praying Mantis, I would like to underscore the importance of
maintaining an overall commitment to achieving the highest standards of
excellence and quality in everything you do, and in particular Mantis.
I will specifically highlight some traditional perspectives as well as
shifting phenomenon occurring in the traditional Mantis world as
related to concepts of tradition, the internet, performance videos,
belts & certificates, and the meaning of forms.
If you find yourself becoming
complacent, give yourself a kick in the
Mantis ass, challenge yourself and your peers, and raise those
standards to the next level. All successful individuals regardless of
profession understand and practice this operandi.
2. Meaning of Tradition
For people practicing PM under
a high quality traditional teacher, the
entire notion of what is ‘traditional’ and the standards expected of
them are very clear. But for those not so lucky it can be rather
elusive. Preferring to stay away from troublesome definitive
explanations attempting to pin point the exact merits of a traditional
system based on historical documents, oral history, timelines,
lineages, and technical systems, I will rather highlight a few key
underlying concepts and themes of traditional Mantis. In short,
traditional Mantis is combative, is dedication, is comprehensive, and
is a commitment to excellence.
2.1 Traditional is
Combative
Traditional Mantis is 110%
combat oriented designed for one reason and
one reason only – fighting (some individuals prefer the term ‘self
defence’ as it does not elicit the same kind negative images). Of
course there are other personal as well as health giving benefits from
studying, but Mantis was not designed for the purpose of simple
exercise or self realization. If you are not learning how to fight you
are not learning traditional Mantis. All too often I see people loosing
sight of this in their training, where they just go through the motions
lacking focus, power, speed, precision, and most importantly intent.
This results in an overall watering down effect and inhibits your
ability to achieve fighting proficiency. Engaging in any kind of
training exercise that lacks combative focus and intent is a
bastardization of traditional Mantis.
Another notion within this
precept is the idea of being system
specific. That is if you are going to label yourself traditional
Mantis, you better know how to fight using the strategies and
techniques generally employed within the Mantis system. It is a real
travesty to see PM individuals revert to kickboxing basics under the
pretence that it is Mantis. This is not Mantis skill.
2.2 Traditional is
Dedication
Traditional Mantis is NOT a
part time endeavour one participates in two
or three times a week. It is training seven days a week, it is
focussed, it is intense, and it is quality training where one pushes
their mind and bodies to the limits and beyond. If you are an
individual who grimaces at the thought of that lactic acid burn, one
who chooses to cut out the last three repetitions because it hurts to
much, finds the idea of fighting too controversial, and/or lack the
overall motivation to push yourself to and train everyday, then
unfortunately you are not dedicated by traditional standards. Anything
less is regarded simply as extracurricular and/or leisure time.
Often individuals will make
poor excuses that modern life styles do not
permit enough time during the day to adequately train. But I would
argue in its simplest terms that dedication today is no different than
it was three hundred years ago. Everyone works, and when you are not
working you are training. Very much similar to the concept of a high
performance professional athlete - if you want to achieve superior
performance in your area of expertise, you must make sacrifices, and
you must train day in day out at a level of physical and mental
intensity superior to anyone else. Look in the mirror and realistically
ask yourself, am I a dedicated practitioner by traditional standards?
2.3 Traditional is
Comprehensive
Traditional Mantis training is
pragmatic, and progressive. Pragmatic in
the sense that it is practical, realistic, no none-sense, hard nosed,
common sense combat training covering most scenarios. There are no
mystical secrets in Mantis – only hard work and intelligent training
with an experienced teacher. If your teacher tells you there is secret
knowledge then they are full of themselves, possibly insecure, possibly
elitist, and/or more than likely just hiding their own lack of
knowledge or ability to fight (dong shou).
Traditional is progressive in
the sense that training advances in a
very logical yet rigorous manner from a series of controlled
fundamentals movements providing the students with theoretical building
blocks (i.e. strength, flexibility, coordination, speed, body
mechanics, determination, power, single motions, combinations, forms
training, two man drills, base applications), advancing through a
series of progressive stages designed to increasingly build, enhance,
and apply the students fundamental base (i.e. increasing intensity and
reaction training, increasing use of applied body mechanics and
variations in applications and combinations, and the increasing use of
applied speed/power/focus, etc…), with the eventual goal of building a
high performance free fighting Mantis athlete. These examples cited are
by no means exhaustive in traditional Mantis training, while in fact an
entire piece could be dedicated to detailing the process.
If you feel your training is
not preparing you properly or adequately
for a street fight then your need to reassess your commitment to the
program, or the nature of the program itself. Unfortunately there are
many so called teachers out there who either do not care, have not
received the full transmission of knowledge, or who have chosen to
water down the learning process in order market traditional kung fu to
the general public. If teachers accelerate the process to quickly,
and/or completely miss out on developing key attributes, this will
drastically inhibit the students ability to achieve combat proficiency
by the traditional standards, while weakening the overall integrity of
the system.
2.4 Traditional is
Commitment to Higher Standards
Traditional Mantis is about
commitment to maintaining the highest
standards of excellence in everything you do. It requires you to break
out of the shell of mediocrity and push your cognitive and physical
abilities to the next level and beyond. Not only with regards to
achieving your potential in Mantis fighting, but also in making
yourself a better person and upholding key values of respect,
integrity, responsibility, honour, pride, passion, self discipline, and
learning. In the real world this is what separates the successful human
beings from the mediocre ones, and in the past this is what separated
the true masters from the wannabe’s. More often than not this tends to
be a sticking point for many ‘teachers’ as they do not continually
strive meet new standards in applied performance, nor are they truly
committed to providing their students with the best quality education
in the Mantis combative arts.
As a final disclaimer there is
a lot more one could say about what is
and isn’t traditional Mantis, but I feel these simple common sense
concepts cover the bulk of such. Moreover the above concepts should be
viewed as an all or nothing endeavour, and would argue that
inadequacies or a lack of commitment in any of the above automatically
negate your illusion of being traditional.
3. Belts &
Certificates – The World of Empty
Recognition
Belts and certificates denoting
the accumulation of theoretical
knowledge or achievements of some designated level of martial
proficiency have absolutely no place in the traditional training hall,
and never will. Truly dedicated practitioners remain focussed on one
goal and one goal only – applied personal performance. Superficial
revenue generating, newbie motivating, ego enhancing pieces of paper to
hang on student’s walls, as well as status oriented sashes to tie
around the waists insecure masters are virtually meaningless in the
real world of fighting performance. It is always amusing to hear
individuals introducing themselves as 9th degree red sashes, or
whatever magic marker color scheme they have, as if it is some
internationally recognized standard of Chinese combat proficiency. When
was the last time you saw dedicated professional athletes and coaches
adopting status oriented belts, certificates, and levels? The bottom
line is, the only way to realistically assess your ability in a
traditional martial art is to engage yourself in an applied no holds
barred fight. As disheartening and controversial as this sounds, there
will continue to remain an unverifiable and perhaps delusional gap
between your combat proficiency and your designated belt level. This
gap of inconsistency further promotes the watering down affect I
mentioned earlier on the integrity of traditional systems.
4. The Zone for Kung Fu
Junkies & Arm Chair
Masters
The internet has provided
Mantis practitioners with a wonderful tool
for sharing and exchanging ideas and information across large
geographic regions. It has also enabled us to make new friends and
acquaintances with some very top quality individuals and practitioners.
But it has also become the wasteland for kung fu junkies and arm chair
masters who thoughtlessly post low quality, technically insufficient,
gemeric, erroneous, and misleading pieces regarding Mantis concepts,
their latest PM research findings, their favourite techniques,
uploading their personal training clips, and in general publicizing
their obvious lack of PM knowledge and commitment to producing quality
work.
Admittedly from time to time
there are some excellent posts from
teachers and individuals who are obviously very knowledgeable and
thoughtful; however the majority of contents tend to remain hap
hazardously below average, more often than not bordering on realm of
what can only be described as perhaps a temporary loss in cognitive
abilities and/or virtual ignorance.
In the future I would like to
encourage individuals to put more
thought, care, and diligence into their postings in order to improve
the overall quality of the Mantis forum. And as a reminder for those
new to Mantis with a genuine interest, it would definitely be wise to
seek advice and/or take up questions personally with your teacher,
rather than risk the inconsistencies of the forum.
5. Perspective on Online
Performance Videos
Personal performance/training
videos possess merit for analyzing your
own individual body mechanics and/or techniques. And although it does
not replace the presence of a truly qualified and knowledgeable
teacher, it can provide you with valuable supplementary feedback.
Recently however I have
witnessed an alarming increase in the number of
purportedly traditional Mantis video/training clips posted online.
Although there is nothing inherently wrong with doing so, I remain
deeply disturbed in four regards: i) the quality of execution (not
cinematography), ii) the pretence under which they are posted, iii) the
general online response to such clips, and iv) how it reflects upon
traditional Mantis community.
5.1 Quality of Execution
Does Not Meet Traditional
Standards
I will apologize in advance for
the use of direct language but we need
to cut through all of the delusions and get down to the bottom line.
The majority of video clips posted were absolute rubbish in terms of
the quality of execution. The standards of traditional Mantis as passed
down to us from the generations before us demanded precision execution
in applied skill, speed, power, and combative intent. Anything less was
not, and is not acceptable.
Possibly most disturbing have
been the so called Mantis sparring clips,
demonstrating picture perfectly what real traditional kung fu is NOT.
No where in any of those videos did I see traces of APPLIED Mantis
fighting fundamentals. Everything from intent, contact, footwork, body
positioning, timing, distancing, reaction, kicking, striking, bridging,
controlling, speed, power, and the entire arsenal of Mantis techniques
were either none existent, or at below average levels. It was amateur
kickboxing night at best. There were even video clips of Mantis
combatants wearing full protective gear and executing with zero power
and zero intent. Top level traditional teachers would never teach,
never tolerate, and never accept this type of behaviour and/or skill in
their training halls. This is so far from the original teachings. As a
side however I do agree with the concept of common sense training and
not maiming your kung fu brothers and sisters. This is a given.
Moving on, there were also a
few below standard forms performances
floating around the Mantis forum. Everything from just all-round poorly
executed forms, to clips of individuals performing forms at tai ji
speed in competitions. Fundamental errors and problem areas continue to
surface with regards to footwork (bu fa), upper body mechanics (shen
fa), and execution with regards to speed, power and intent. Footwork
including stances and transition’s were NOT STRONG, meaning not
precise, not low enough, not stable enough, not coordinated enough, not
explosive enough, and not fast enough. If you do not have good footwork
then you do not have good kung fu. The shen fa or upper body mechanics
lacked precision, power, intent, fluidity, and once again was not in
coordination with the lower body. Flailing arms at high speeds with
uncoordinated footwork is not regarded as a sound performance. I will
however in all fairness give credit as some of the performers were in
fact students and not teachers. It really blows me away to think that
these are the acceptable performance standards from traditional Mantis
teachers nowadays.
As a disclaimer I will note
that there have been a select number of
video clips performed by true masters properly demonstrating various
aspects of traditional Mantis skill.
5.2 Pretence of Postings –
Does Not Qualify as
Traditional
Posting below average video
clips of supposed Mantis sparring and forms
performances under the pretence that it represents traditional praying
Mantis skill is absolutely absurd. The skills presented in such video’s
are very far away from the original teachings of our past masters, and
they would be shocked to see such a degradation of such.
5.3 Online Reponses – Poor
Traditional
Representation
Equally shocking, or not, is
the general air of online approval
complimenting participants on their fine execution of Mantis skill.
Unfortunately this very clearly highlights one of two things; a) a
fundamental lack of understanding of what good traditional Mantis is,
or b) politically correct face saving politeness in lieu of less than
satisfactory performances.
5.4 Watering Down Effect
on Traditional Mantis
Community
Although I commend those
individuals for their good intentions and
bravery in attempting to seek constructive feedback, and/or somehow
further promote greater Mantis awareness, but good intentions and poor
execution are not acceptable in the real world, including traditional
PM. Unfortunately such activities reflect poorly on those individuals,
their schools, their teachers, and in general the greater Mantis
community
6. Meaning of Meaningless
Forms
Forms are a valuable
intermediary training tool, but do not and can not
build real applied fighting skills. This all sounds very common sense
but it is surprising how many schools mistakenly, unknowingly or not,
regard forms as being the highest level of achievable skill in
traditional Mantis kung fu. Intentionally or not, a divergence exists.
At this point it can not be stressed enough that the truly highest
level of traditional Mantis kung fu is real free fighting ability using
the skills and strategy the (Mantis) systems represents – not kick
boxing.
As mentioned above, forms
function as only one training tool amongst
the many pieces of the larger puzzle in the traditional PM training
curriculum. And although they do not teach us things how to fight, they
do serve some intermediary purposes:
Provide students with an
introduction to the basic motions of Mantis
Enable students to develop
theoretical footwork, body mechanics,
coordination, balance, speed, quickness, limited combinations, etc…
Act as a gauge in the early
phases of development enabling teachers to
measure (estimate) the dedication of the student via the progress in
his/her forms (i.e. the rate of improvement has a direct relationship
with the time a student inputs into their training)
Note: Once again much more
could be written about the detailed function
forms play in the intermediary phases of a students training, but for
now the above are sufficient in highlighting some of the more obvious
functions.
Unfortunately there remain a
number of paper tigers out
there who are capable of performing beautifully technically proficient
forms, while at the same time portraying the image of being “old
school” traditional, yet incapable of using Mantis to take care of
themselves in a combative situation. Wushu performers tend to take the
blunt of this, however there remain individuals and teachers within
legitimate traditional systems who put an interesting spin on the tale
of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, acting like fierce free fighting Mantis
beasts, and talking the talk, but in reality no more potent than the
old “wushu” man Mr. Hide himself.
The entire issue of Over
Valuing forms stems from an individuals flawed
understanding and/or misconstrued attitudes towards traditional Mantis.
The reasons for which are beyond this paper, but what is important is
the result - a paradox shift from combat oriented training, to forms
oriented training, where forms eventually end up taking on the essence
of the system. This is a genuine travesty in the PM and traditional
martial arts world.
Forms are beautiful to watch,
but when it comes to the end of the day
they are just another training tool in the Mantis curriculum. In this
perspective forms should be taken for what they are, nothing more, and
nothing less.
7. Closing Remarks
The intentions of this article
today were not to directly attack
anyone, but to rather simply highlight and bring to attention some of
the deteriorating standards that exist in the traditional Mantis
community, as well as provide some very classic and very specific
examples. As traditional Mantis is a large part of my life, this topic
in particular remains close to my heart.
Traditional Mantis is many
things to many people, but its essence
remains fixed, and can not be changed nor compromised. Traditional is
combative, traditional is dedication, traditional is comprehensive, and
traditional represents a firm commitment to maintaining only the
highest standards of excellence and quality in our training. Divergence
from any of these and you compromise your claims to training
traditional kung fu. Yes in theory you may train a traditional system,
but you do not actually train traditional. Traditional is not about
talking, it is about doing. It is not about how many forms you know,
but how well you can use them. It is not about superficial belts,
uniforms, certificates, or competitions; it is about true dedication,
true knowledge, and true performance.
I would like to make a call for
all ‘masters’ who read the site to no
longer accept low standards. In closing I strongly believe it is better
to be forthright, honest and demanding, than to blindly accept low
standards and exercise politically correct attitudes.
Kind regards,
Kai Uwe Pel
Shanghai - dated
June 8, 2004
|